Skip to content

Trim the 6.0 workflows#11134

Open
johnbillion wants to merge 1 commit intoWordPress:6.0from
johnbillion:6.0-workflows
Open

Trim the 6.0 workflows#11134
johnbillion wants to merge 1 commit intoWordPress:6.0from
johnbillion:6.0-workflows

Conversation

@johnbillion
Copy link
Member

Previously: #10165

  • The reusable workflow files have already been removed from this branch.
  • The e2e test workflow in this branch is already pinned to PHP 8.0.

Trac ticket: https://core.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/64083

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Mar 3, 2026

The following accounts have interacted with this PR and/or linked issues. I will continue to update these lists as activity occurs. You can also manually ask me to refresh this list by adding the props-bot label.

Core Committers: Use this line as a base for the props when committing in SVN:

Props johnbillion, desrosj.

To understand the WordPress project's expectations around crediting contributors, please review the Contributor Attribution page in the Core Handbook.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Mar 3, 2026

Test using WordPress Playground

The changes in this pull request can previewed and tested using a WordPress Playground instance.

WordPress Playground is an experimental project that creates a full WordPress instance entirely within the browser.

Some things to be aware of

  • All changes will be lost when closing a tab with a Playground instance.
  • All changes will be lost when refreshing the page.
  • A fresh instance is created each time the link below is clicked.
  • Every time this pull request is updated, a new ZIP file containing all changes is created. If changes are not reflected in the Playground instance,
    it's possible that the most recent build failed, or has not completed. Check the list of workflow runs to be sure.

For more details about these limitations and more, check out the Limitations page in the WordPress Playground documentation.

Test this pull request with WordPress Playground.

@johnbillion johnbillion requested a review from desrosj March 3, 2026 22:45
@desrosj
Copy link
Member

desrosj commented Mar 4, 2026

@johnbillion What do you think of also trimming 8.1 here? It's set to allow-failures. The release did have beta support. But if the suite does not fully pass to begin with, is it worth keeping those combinations?

I reviewed this one after th 5.9 PR (#11136). But the same question goes for that branch also.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How did this one get left here. This is a real old iteration. 😅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants